Carbon dating fun facts dating for sex only
Let us imagine that the date reported by the lab was 150.7 ± 2.8 million years.
Here he can see that some curved sedimentary rocks have been cut vertically by a sheet of volcanic rock called a dyke.In other words, the age should lie between 197.2 million years and 203.6 million years.However, this error is not the real error on the date.Would he have concluded that the fossil date for the sediments was wrong? Would he have thought that the radiometric dating method was flawed? Instead of questioning the method, he would say that the radiometric date was not recording the time that the rock solidified.He may suggest that the rock contained crystals (called xenocrysts) that formed long before the rock solidified and that these crystals gave an older date.
(Creationists do not agree with these ages of millions of years because of the assumptions they are based on.) Because of his interest in the volcanic dyke, he collects a sample, being careful to select rock that looks fresh and unaltered.